This paper is an economical study of the rationality of the confidential obligation of attorney and prescription of prosecution.Through the behavior analysis centering on the cost -income related to the parties involved, this paper concludes that the confidential obligation of attorney and prescription of prosecution can not realize the maxim of judicial proceeds at a low level of private and social costs, that is , these two rules result in the low efficiency of the judicial resource allocation .
|Translated title of the contribution||法律追诉时效制度的经济分析: 挑战中外法学界主流观点|
|Original language||Chinese (Simplified)|
|Publication status||Published - 2005|
- Economics of Law
- (Economic Analysis of Law
- (Law and Economics