新自由主义之后?

Translated title of the contribution: After Neoliberalism

泰伯 威廉·凯, 高 玉华, 王 中保

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

What comes after neoliberalism? To answer that question we must ask a more fundamental question: What do neoliberalism and neoconsetvatism have in common with the antiglobalization and antiwar movements? The answer is that all ostensibly share a focus on redefining democracy in the contemporary world system. Neoliberalism is widely understood, even by many mainstream economists and policy wonks, to have failed in terms of its announced goals. The admission that neoliberalism has failed in terms of its announced goals has forced its proponents to a tactical retreat-defending the broad thrust of the neoliberal policy agenda under cover of "reform". The result is an augmented Washington Consensus that blames client states and not international institutions or transnational capital for the failures of neoliberalism. Critics of the neoclassical approach would reform international regimes to make them fairer to the less developed countries by protectilocal producers and the autonomy of local governments so that international exchange is truly based on mutual consent and fairness. Everyone speaking for public attribution in the post Cold War era seems to favor democracy. For the global institutions, the preferred term is, however, "good governance", and for the Bush Administration, it is "liberty". The problematic relationship between these terms and what movement activists have in mind by democracy gets to the heart of the conflict over what type of world is possible. The global justice movement has been right to focus on the pain inflicted around the world by the IMF' and the World Bank, the collectors of debt incurred by despots and corrupt elites but paid in the life blood of ordinary people. The consequences of eoliberalism have forced a frightened awareness of what is at stake, and in many places have inspired the development of a counter-hegemonic consciousness and a renewed mobilization of people. It is in their understanding of the central importance of a broader definition of democracy that the antiglobalization and antiwar movements, or better, the alternative globalization movement represent a dramatic challenge to class rule and Bush Bonapartism.
Original languageChinese (Simplified)
Pages (from-to)93-101
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Economics of Shanghai School
Volume2
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

neoliberalism
democracy
Bonapartism
class rule
international regime
reform
good governance
IMF
World Bank
fairness
economist
cold war
attribution
international relations
indebtedness
consciousness
mobilization
pain
speaking
critic

Keywords

  • Neoliberalism
  • Antiglobalization and antiwar movements(Alternative glo- balization movement)
  • Neoconservatism Definition of democracy

Cite this

泰伯威廉·凯, 高玉华, & 王中保 (2004). 新自由主义之后? Journal of Economics of Shanghai School, 2(4), 93-101.

新自由主义之后? / 泰伯威廉·凯; 高玉华; 王中保.

In: Journal of Economics of Shanghai School, Vol. 2, No. 4, 2004, p. 93-101.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

泰伯威廉·凯, 高玉华 & 王中保 2004, '新自由主义之后?', Journal of Economics of Shanghai School, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 93-101.
泰伯威廉·凯, 高玉华, 王中保. 新自由主义之后? Journal of Economics of Shanghai School. 2004;2(4):93-101.
泰伯威廉·凯 ; 高玉华 ; 王中保. / 新自由主义之后?. In: Journal of Economics of Shanghai School. 2004 ; Vol. 2, No. 4. pp. 93-101.
@article{aa68bb5fb150487c8152779ba8032de3,
title = "新自由主义之后?",
abstract = "新自由主义之后是什么?在回答这个问题之前须要问一个更基本的问题:新自由主义和新保守主义,与反全球化和反战运动有哪些共同之处?答案是,在当代世界体系中所有它们表面上都在关注对民主的重新界定。相对于新自由主义宣称的目标而言,人们广泛认识到它已经失败,这甚至被许多主流经济学家和政客认识到。承认新自由主义就其宣称的目标而言已经失败,迫使它的倡导者做出战略性的撤退——以保护在{"}改革{"}的幌子下推进新自由主义政策的广泛锐气。其结果是扩大的{"}华盛顿共识{"},它不是把新自由主义的失败归责于国际机构或跨国资本,而去指责其附庸国。对新古典主义方法的批评者将改革国际体制,使他们更公平对待不发展国家,就是通过保护当地生产...",
keywords = "Neoliberalism, Antiglobalization and antiwar movements(Alternative glo- balization movement), Neoconservatism Definition of democracy, 新自由主义, 反全球化和反战运动(可行的全球化运动), 新保守主义民主的界定",
author = "威廉·凯 泰伯 and 玉华 高 and 中保 王",
year = "2004",
language = "Chinese (Simplified)",
volume = "2",
pages = "93--101",
journal = "Journal of Economics of Shanghai School",
publisher = "上海财经大学海派经济学研究中心",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - 新自由主义之后?

AU - 泰伯, 威廉·凯

AU - 高, 玉华

AU - 王, 中保

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - 新自由主义之后是什么?在回答这个问题之前须要问一个更基本的问题:新自由主义和新保守主义,与反全球化和反战运动有哪些共同之处?答案是,在当代世界体系中所有它们表面上都在关注对民主的重新界定。相对于新自由主义宣称的目标而言,人们广泛认识到它已经失败,这甚至被许多主流经济学家和政客认识到。承认新自由主义就其宣称的目标而言已经失败,迫使它的倡导者做出战略性的撤退——以保护在"改革"的幌子下推进新自由主义政策的广泛锐气。其结果是扩大的"华盛顿共识",它不是把新自由主义的失败归责于国际机构或跨国资本,而去指责其附庸国。对新古典主义方法的批评者将改革国际体制,使他们更公平对待不发展国家,就是通过保护当地生产...

AB - 新自由主义之后是什么?在回答这个问题之前须要问一个更基本的问题:新自由主义和新保守主义,与反全球化和反战运动有哪些共同之处?答案是,在当代世界体系中所有它们表面上都在关注对民主的重新界定。相对于新自由主义宣称的目标而言,人们广泛认识到它已经失败,这甚至被许多主流经济学家和政客认识到。承认新自由主义就其宣称的目标而言已经失败,迫使它的倡导者做出战略性的撤退——以保护在"改革"的幌子下推进新自由主义政策的广泛锐气。其结果是扩大的"华盛顿共识",它不是把新自由主义的失败归责于国际机构或跨国资本,而去指责其附庸国。对新古典主义方法的批评者将改革国际体制,使他们更公平对待不发展国家,就是通过保护当地生产...

KW - Neoliberalism

KW - Antiglobalization and antiwar movements(Alternative glo- balization movement)

KW - Neoconservatism Definition of democracy

KW - 新自由主义

KW - 反全球化和反战运动(可行的全球化运动)

KW - 新保守主义民主的界定

M3 - 文章

VL - 2

SP - 93

EP - 101

JO - Journal of Economics of Shanghai School

JF - Journal of Economics of Shanghai School

IS - 4

ER -