思想政治教育“双主体说”评析

Translated title of the contribution: Analysis on "Double Subject Concept" in Ideological And Political Education

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The nature of "Double Subject Concept" is to take the object of education and educatorn equally in the educational process. There exist many logical and theoretical problems in this concept,which cannot be called as a theory. The concept separated educators and object of education into two processions,which lead to the logical contradictions. There are also three major theoretical problems in "Double Subject Concept",including blurring the basic relationships between educators and educatee,blurring the different functions of educators and educatee,blurring the different effect of educators and educatee,as well as weakening the responsibility and self-confidence of teachers as main position in education. It is a premise to handle well the relationships between educators and educatee in ideological and political education for improving teaching qualities and effect.
Original languageChinese (Simplified)
Pages (from-to)100-105
Number of pages6
Journal教学与研究
Issue number08
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

political education
educator
education
self-confidence
responsibility
Teaching
teacher

Keywords

  • double subject concept
  • logical contradiction
  • theoretical misunderstanding
  • responsibility and self-confidence

Cite this

思想政治教育“双主体说”评析. / Gu, Yumin.

In: 教学与研究, No. 08, 2013, p. 100-105.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{684694dfcef6410ebea5919007fb5a2c,
title = "思想政治教育“双主体说”评析",
abstract = "{"}双主体说{"}的实质是把思想政治教育过程中的教育对象上升到主体位置,与教育者并列成为主体。这一观点存在着逻辑上、理论上的诸多问题,难以成立。{"}双主体说{"}把教育过程涉及的教育者和教育对象这两个方面,说成是两个过程,由此产生了逻辑上不能自圆其说的矛盾。{"}双主体说{"}在理论研究上也存在着三大问题:一是模糊了教育者与教育对象的基本关系;二是模糊了教育者与教育对象的不同功能;三是模糊了教育者与教育对象的不同作用。同时也淡化了教师作为教育主体的责任和自信。准确把握思想政治教育主体和对象的关系,是提高教育教学质量和效果的基本前提。",
keywords = "double subject concept, logical contradiction, theoretical misunderstanding, responsibility and self-confidence, “双主体”说, 逻辑矛盾, 理论误区, 责任与自信",
author = "Yumin Gu",
year = "2013",
language = "Chinese (Simplified)",
pages = "100--105",
journal = "教学与研究",
issn = "0257-2826",
number = "08",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - 思想政治教育“双主体说”评析

AU - Gu, Yumin

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - "双主体说"的实质是把思想政治教育过程中的教育对象上升到主体位置,与教育者并列成为主体。这一观点存在着逻辑上、理论上的诸多问题,难以成立。"双主体说"把教育过程涉及的教育者和教育对象这两个方面,说成是两个过程,由此产生了逻辑上不能自圆其说的矛盾。"双主体说"在理论研究上也存在着三大问题:一是模糊了教育者与教育对象的基本关系;二是模糊了教育者与教育对象的不同功能;三是模糊了教育者与教育对象的不同作用。同时也淡化了教师作为教育主体的责任和自信。准确把握思想政治教育主体和对象的关系,是提高教育教学质量和效果的基本前提。

AB - "双主体说"的实质是把思想政治教育过程中的教育对象上升到主体位置,与教育者并列成为主体。这一观点存在着逻辑上、理论上的诸多问题,难以成立。"双主体说"把教育过程涉及的教育者和教育对象这两个方面,说成是两个过程,由此产生了逻辑上不能自圆其说的矛盾。"双主体说"在理论研究上也存在着三大问题:一是模糊了教育者与教育对象的基本关系;二是模糊了教育者与教育对象的不同功能;三是模糊了教育者与教育对象的不同作用。同时也淡化了教师作为教育主体的责任和自信。准确把握思想政治教育主体和对象的关系,是提高教育教学质量和效果的基本前提。

KW - double subject concept

KW - logical contradiction

KW - theoretical misunderstanding

KW - responsibility and self-confidence

KW - “双主体”说

KW - 逻辑矛盾

KW - 理论误区

KW - 责任与自信

M3 - 文章

SP - 100

EP - 105

JO - 教学与研究

JF - 教学与研究

SN - 0257-2826

IS - 08

ER -