评张春霖的“逻辑链条”和“社会主义”公式

Translated title of the contribution: Comment on Zhang Chun-lin's "Logic Chain" and "Socialism" Formula

陈 国恒

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article comments on two theories of privatizing in two papers of Mr. Zhang Chun-lin. One is his "logic chain" theory. According to this theory, once market mechanism is introduced, the state-owned property right must withdraw totally from enterprises, and "property right privatization" and "control power privatization" must be implemented. This article proves theoretically and practically that this theory is untenable thoroughly. Its policies are to support privatization under the guise of "statewned economic layout adjustment". Secondly, this article comments on his theory of "social justice+market economy=socialism"(first proposed by Dong Furen and Wu Jing-lian),and points out the definition of "social justice". Its formula is actually "private ownership+market economy=socialism", and "socialism" must be set up through these kind of privatization, which is to disguise capitalism as socialism The article also thinks that mentions of this "socialism" in the same breath with Deng Xiaoping's comment on socialist essence is not serious on the style of study. Please give your advice to this text
Original languageChinese (Simplified)
Pages (from-to)173-184
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Economics of Shanghai School
Volume3
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

socialism
privatization
right of ownership
market economy
social justice
market mechanism
layout
capitalist society
economics

Keywords

  • socialist formula
  • political economy theory
  • state-owned economy
  • social justice pnvatizarion

Cite this

评张春霖的“逻辑链条”和“社会主义”公式. / 陈国恒.

In: Journal of Economics of Shanghai School, Vol. 3, No. 3, 2005, p. 173-184.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{49d4a44142e340cb99c193ff4700a2a7,
title = "评张春霖的“逻辑链条”和“社会主义”公式",
abstract = "本文评论了张春霖先生在两篇论文中提出的两个相呼应的私有化理论。首先是他的{"}逻辑链条{"}理论。按照该理论,市场机制一旦被引入,国有产权就必须从企业中全盘退出,实行{"}产权私有化{"}和{"}控制权私有化{"}。本文通过理论和对实践的分析证明,该理论是根本不能成立的。其次是评论了他的{"}社会公正+市场经济=社会主义{"}的公式(最早由董辅礽、吴敬琏研究员提出此公式),指出按他对{"}社会公正{"}含义的界定,其公式实际是{"}私有制+市场经济=社会主义{"},因而必须通过私有化建立这种{"}社会主义{"}。这是用资本主义冒充社会主义。文章还认为把这种{"}社会主义{"}与邓小平关于社会主义本质的论述相提并论,在学风上是不严肃的。对本文所论赐教。",
keywords = "socialist formula, political economy theory, state-owned economy, social justice pnvatizarion, 社会主义公式, 政治经济学理论, 国有经济, 社会公正, 私有化",
author = "国恒 陈",
year = "2005",
language = "Chinese (Simplified)",
volume = "3",
pages = "173--184",
journal = "Journal of Economics of Shanghai School",
publisher = "上海财经大学海派经济学研究中心",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - 评张春霖的“逻辑链条”和“社会主义”公式

AU - 陈, 国恒

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - 本文评论了张春霖先生在两篇论文中提出的两个相呼应的私有化理论。首先是他的"逻辑链条"理论。按照该理论,市场机制一旦被引入,国有产权就必须从企业中全盘退出,实行"产权私有化"和"控制权私有化"。本文通过理论和对实践的分析证明,该理论是根本不能成立的。其次是评论了他的"社会公正+市场经济=社会主义"的公式(最早由董辅礽、吴敬琏研究员提出此公式),指出按他对"社会公正"含义的界定,其公式实际是"私有制+市场经济=社会主义",因而必须通过私有化建立这种"社会主义"。这是用资本主义冒充社会主义。文章还认为把这种"社会主义"与邓小平关于社会主义本质的论述相提并论,在学风上是不严肃的。对本文所论赐教。

AB - 本文评论了张春霖先生在两篇论文中提出的两个相呼应的私有化理论。首先是他的"逻辑链条"理论。按照该理论,市场机制一旦被引入,国有产权就必须从企业中全盘退出,实行"产权私有化"和"控制权私有化"。本文通过理论和对实践的分析证明,该理论是根本不能成立的。其次是评论了他的"社会公正+市场经济=社会主义"的公式(最早由董辅礽、吴敬琏研究员提出此公式),指出按他对"社会公正"含义的界定,其公式实际是"私有制+市场经济=社会主义",因而必须通过私有化建立这种"社会主义"。这是用资本主义冒充社会主义。文章还认为把这种"社会主义"与邓小平关于社会主义本质的论述相提并论,在学风上是不严肃的。对本文所论赐教。

KW - socialist formula

KW - political economy theory

KW - state-owned economy

KW - social justice pnvatizarion

KW - 社会主义公式

KW - 政治经济学理论

KW - 国有经济

KW - 社会公正

KW - 私有化

M3 - 文章

VL - 3

SP - 173

EP - 184

JO - Journal of Economics of Shanghai School

JF - Journal of Economics of Shanghai School

IS - 3

ER -