斯拉法、斯梯德曼和萨缪尔森价值理论批评

Translated title of the contribution: Criticism on Value Determination Theories in Western Economics: Discussions with Sraffa,Steedman and Samuelson

岳 宏志

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article points out that physical quantity approach of value determination is impossible. The systems proposed by Sraffa,Steedman and Samuelson are completely false. Marxist value of labor theory laid a solid foundation for scientific price theory.
Original languageChinese (Simplified)
Pages (from-to)140-156
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Economics of Shanghai School
Volume5
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

price theory
labor theory of value
criticism
economics
Values

Keywords

  • physical quantity approach
  • value
  • Sraffa
  • Steedman
  • Samuelson

Cite this

斯拉法、斯梯德曼和萨缪尔森价值理论批评. / 岳宏志.

In: Journal of Economics of Shanghai School, Vol. 5, No. 3, 2007, p. 140-156.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{eff30b2a40cf446e90f9af7fbff2d937,
title = "斯拉法、斯梯德曼和萨缪尔森价值理论批评",
abstract = "本文指出斯拉法、斯梯德曼和萨缪尔森用实物量方法来决定价值是不能成立的,他们的体系本身是完全错误的。马克思的劳动价值论为科学的价格理论奠定了坚实的基础。",
keywords = "physical quantity approach, value, Sraffa, Steedman, Samuelson, 实物量方法, 价值, 斯拉法, 斯梯德曼, 萨缪尔森",
author = "宏志 岳",
year = "2007",
language = "Chinese (Simplified)",
volume = "5",
pages = "140--156",
journal = "Journal of Economics of Shanghai School",
publisher = "上海财经大学海派经济学研究中心",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - 斯拉法、斯梯德曼和萨缪尔森价值理论批评

AU - 岳, 宏志

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - 本文指出斯拉法、斯梯德曼和萨缪尔森用实物量方法来决定价值是不能成立的,他们的体系本身是完全错误的。马克思的劳动价值论为科学的价格理论奠定了坚实的基础。

AB - 本文指出斯拉法、斯梯德曼和萨缪尔森用实物量方法来决定价值是不能成立的,他们的体系本身是完全错误的。马克思的劳动价值论为科学的价格理论奠定了坚实的基础。

KW - physical quantity approach

KW - value

KW - Sraffa

KW - Steedman

KW - Samuelson

KW - 实物量方法

KW - 价值

KW - 斯拉法

KW - 斯梯德曼

KW - 萨缪尔森

M3 - 文章

VL - 5

SP - 140

EP - 156

JO - Journal of Economics of Shanghai School

JF - Journal of Economics of Shanghai School

IS - 3

ER -