In Hyperspace.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Fredric Jameson indulges a view of Hegel that has been challenged for some time (LRB, 10 September). It assumes that Hegel sees Vorstellung (‘picture-thinking’, or ‘representation’) as in need of supersession by a more adequate mode known as ‘philosophy’. In fact he sees it as a necessary moment – a recognition by the self of its relation to material others – by which all genuine thinking proceeds. As for the ‘end of art’ specifically, Hegel is not trying to establish a ‘philosophy no longer obliged to rely on picture-thinking for its solutions’. The thesis describes a central feature of modernity for Hegel: namely, that representation reveals itself as not exhausting the possibilities of thought, but this does not mean that thought can do without representation. Philosophy’s task is to comprehend that difference, not to abolish it.
Original languageEnglish
Article number6
Pages (from-to)17
Number of pages22
JournalLondon Review of Books
Volumev.37
Issue numberno.17
Publication statusPublished - Sep 10 2015

Fingerprint

Georg W.F. Hegel
Hyperspace
Philosophy
Thought
Fredric Jameson
Art
Modernity

Cite this

Jameson, F. (2015). In Hyperspace. London Review of Books , v.37(no.17), 17. [6].

In Hyperspace. / Jameson, Fredric.

In: London Review of Books , Vol. v.37, No. no.17, 6, 10.09.2015, p. 17.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jameson, F 2015, 'In Hyperspace.', London Review of Books , vol. v.37, no. no.17, 6, pp. 17.
Jameson F. In Hyperspace. London Review of Books . 2015 Sep 10;v.37(no.17):17. 6.
Jameson, Fredric. / In Hyperspace. In: London Review of Books . 2015 ; Vol. v.37, No. no.17. pp. 17.
@article{e82db79099174ad7990f1d414059a82b,
title = "In Hyperspace.",
abstract = "Fredric Jameson indulges a view of Hegel that has been challenged for some time (LRB, 10 September). It assumes that Hegel sees Vorstellung (‘picture-thinking’, or ‘representation’) as in need of supersession by a more adequate mode known as ‘philosophy’. In fact he sees it as a necessary moment – a recognition by the self of its relation to material others – by which all genuine thinking proceeds. As for the ‘end of art’ specifically, Hegel is not trying to establish a ‘philosophy no longer obliged to rely on picture-thinking for its solutions’. The thesis describes a central feature of modernity for Hegel: namely, that representation reveals itself as not exhausting the possibilities of thought, but this does not mean that thought can do without representation. Philosophy’s task is to comprehend that difference, not to abolish it.",
author = "Fredric Jameson",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "10",
language = "English",
volume = "v.37",
pages = "17",
journal = "London Review of Books",
issn = "0260-9592",
number = "no.17",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - In Hyperspace.

AU - Jameson, Fredric

PY - 2015/9/10

Y1 - 2015/9/10

N2 - Fredric Jameson indulges a view of Hegel that has been challenged for some time (LRB, 10 September). It assumes that Hegel sees Vorstellung (‘picture-thinking’, or ‘representation’) as in need of supersession by a more adequate mode known as ‘philosophy’. In fact he sees it as a necessary moment – a recognition by the self of its relation to material others – by which all genuine thinking proceeds. As for the ‘end of art’ specifically, Hegel is not trying to establish a ‘philosophy no longer obliged to rely on picture-thinking for its solutions’. The thesis describes a central feature of modernity for Hegel: namely, that representation reveals itself as not exhausting the possibilities of thought, but this does not mean that thought can do without representation. Philosophy’s task is to comprehend that difference, not to abolish it.

AB - Fredric Jameson indulges a view of Hegel that has been challenged for some time (LRB, 10 September). It assumes that Hegel sees Vorstellung (‘picture-thinking’, or ‘representation’) as in need of supersession by a more adequate mode known as ‘philosophy’. In fact he sees it as a necessary moment – a recognition by the self of its relation to material others – by which all genuine thinking proceeds. As for the ‘end of art’ specifically, Hegel is not trying to establish a ‘philosophy no longer obliged to rely on picture-thinking for its solutions’. The thesis describes a central feature of modernity for Hegel: namely, that representation reveals itself as not exhausting the possibilities of thought, but this does not mean that thought can do without representation. Philosophy’s task is to comprehend that difference, not to abolish it.

M3 - Article

VL - v.37

SP - 17

JO - London Review of Books

JF - London Review of Books

SN - 0260-9592

IS - no.17

M1 - 6

ER -