论一定长度的工作日表现为相同的价值产品

回应“成正比”争议的第1个命题

Translated title of the contribution: On A Working Day of Certain Hours Represents Product of the Same Value: A Response to Proposition One in the Controversy over "Proportional to"

沈 尤佳, Bin Yu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The debate over“proportional to" involves two propositions. The first:a working day of certain hours always represents product of the same value;The second:the magnitude of commodity value decreases along with increasing labor productivity. This paper is a response to the contraversy over the First Proposition. In the debate were expressions like "the actual selling price","phase difference" and "value exchange coefficient". These expressions were not used to address the problem in reality,that is,they were not used to explain the phenomenon that in the capitalist mode of production"rules are only used as the regulation of the average which is irregulate in itself and functions blindly.”On the contrary,they were meant to deny the general law of inevitability that“no matter what changes take place in the productive force,the value provided by the same labor in the same working hours is always the same" by citing cases of accidental deviation in some enterprises. Obviously,this kind of denial is in vain.
Original languageChinese (Simplified)
Pages (from-to)64-69
Number of pages6
Journal教学与研究
Issue number11
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Enterprise
Denial
Accidental
Labor
Labour Productivity
Deviation
Commodities

Keywords

  • proportional to
  • the same labor
  • labor productivity
  • productive forces
  • magnitude of value

Cite this

论一定长度的工作日表现为相同的价值产品 : 回应“成正比”争议的第1个命题. / 沈尤佳; Yu, Bin.

In: 教学与研究, No. 11, 2011, p. 64-69.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ed7e3e39c14d4ddc945183584cbf9d1d,
title = "论一定长度的工作日表现为相同的价值产品: 回应“成正比”争议的第1个命题",
abstract = "成正比的争议涉及两个命题:一是,一定长度的工作日总是表现为相同的价值产品;二是,劳动生产率提高,单位商品价值量下降。本文回应的是关于第一个命题的争议。在这个问题的争议中,我们看到了{"}有效劳动系数{"}、{"}实际售卖价值{"}、{"}期差性{"}、{"}价值转换系数{"}等种种{"}用语{"}。这些用语没有用来解决实际矛盾即用来说明在资本主义生产方式下,{"}规则只能作为没有规则性的盲目起作用的平均数规律来为自己开辟道路{"},反而被用来企图以个别企业的偶然性偏离来否定必然性的一般规律即{"}不管生产力发生了什么变化,同一劳动在同样的时间内提供的价值量总是相同的。{"}很显然,这种否定是徒劳的。",
keywords = "proportional to, the same labor, labor productivity, productive forces, magnitude of value, 成正比, 同一劳动, 劳动生产率, 生产力, 价值量",
author = "尤佳 沈 and Bin Yu",
year = "2011",
language = "Chinese (Simplified)",
pages = "64--69",
journal = "教学与研究",
issn = "0257-2826",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - 论一定长度的工作日表现为相同的价值产品

T2 - 回应“成正比”争议的第1个命题

AU - 沈, 尤佳

AU - Yu, Bin

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - 成正比的争议涉及两个命题:一是,一定长度的工作日总是表现为相同的价值产品;二是,劳动生产率提高,单位商品价值量下降。本文回应的是关于第一个命题的争议。在这个问题的争议中,我们看到了"有效劳动系数"、"实际售卖价值"、"期差性"、"价值转换系数"等种种"用语"。这些用语没有用来解决实际矛盾即用来说明在资本主义生产方式下,"规则只能作为没有规则性的盲目起作用的平均数规律来为自己开辟道路",反而被用来企图以个别企业的偶然性偏离来否定必然性的一般规律即"不管生产力发生了什么变化,同一劳动在同样的时间内提供的价值量总是相同的。"很显然,这种否定是徒劳的。

AB - 成正比的争议涉及两个命题:一是,一定长度的工作日总是表现为相同的价值产品;二是,劳动生产率提高,单位商品价值量下降。本文回应的是关于第一个命题的争议。在这个问题的争议中,我们看到了"有效劳动系数"、"实际售卖价值"、"期差性"、"价值转换系数"等种种"用语"。这些用语没有用来解决实际矛盾即用来说明在资本主义生产方式下,"规则只能作为没有规则性的盲目起作用的平均数规律来为自己开辟道路",反而被用来企图以个别企业的偶然性偏离来否定必然性的一般规律即"不管生产力发生了什么变化,同一劳动在同样的时间内提供的价值量总是相同的。"很显然,这种否定是徒劳的。

KW - proportional to

KW - the same labor

KW - labor productivity

KW - productive forces

KW - magnitude of value

KW - 成正比

KW - 同一劳动

KW - 劳动生产率

KW - 生产力

KW - 价值量

M3 - 文章

SP - 64

EP - 69

JO - 教学与研究

JF - 教学与研究

SN - 0257-2826

IS - 11

ER -