评张五常唯心史观的制度解释

Translated title of the contribution: On the economic institution from historical idealism

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

According to Professor Cheng S. N, economic institution is a subjective economic organization of the human being. His theory of "to perfect the private property rights" is actually to establish external private ownership. He associates the transaction costs with some subjective factors, so his theory is of no objectivity. It is neither logical nor of historical fact to ascribe the birth of the market relationship and private ownership to the transaction costs, namely, consumption in exchange relationship brings about the market and private property rights come to reduce the consumption. He absolutely replaces or ignores the most fundamental and deepest property right relationship of the ownership of the means of production with simple circulation relationship. His theory bases the economic hypothesis on the maximization of personal income, which agrees with those of "the natural order" and "social contracts" in the 17th century. His entire demonstration is a typical example of historical idealism methodology and goes around the private ownership economy.Confusing the basic economic institution with economic management system, he claims that the fundamental institution of socialism is unreasonable just because of some defects in the management system of planned product economy. Anyway, his statements concerning the save of public resources and diminishment of management system costs are worthy of our attention.
Original languageChinese (Simplified)
Pages (from-to)159-175
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Economics of Shanghai School
Volume1
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2003

Fingerprint

Private ownership
Idealism
Economic institutions
Management system
Property rights
Economics
Private property
Transaction costs
Economics of organization
Ownership
Factors
Methodology
Resources
Socialism
Costs
Personal income
Objectivity
Logic
Defects
Social contract

Keywords

  • historical idealism
  • historical materialism
  • economic institution
  • transaction costs

Cite this

评张五常唯心史观的制度解释. / He, Ganqiang.

In: Journal of Economics of Shanghai School, Vol. 1, No. 3, 2003, p. 159-175.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9f1cc5cf9abb47d798780dc88cc7991f,
title = "评张五常唯心史观的制度解释",
abstract = "张五常先生所解释的经济制度,是入主观选择的经济组织,所谓{"}健全私有产权{"}论,就是私有制永恒论。他的交易成本与人的主观因素联系在一起,所以,由此解释的制度没有客观性。把市场关系和私有制的产生,都归结为交易成本,无疑是说交换关系中的消耗产生了市场,为了减少交换消耗而产生了私有产权,逻辑上说不通,也不符合历史事实。他用简单流通关系,完全替代和抹杀了企业制度中最基本、最深层的生产资料所有制产权关系。把每个人的收入极大化作为经济解释的中心假设,表明了他采用的,完全是传统资产阶级经济学的理论假设,与17世纪的{"}自然秩序{"}论、{"}社会契约{"}论如出一辙。他的整个论证是在私有制经济中兜圈子,是唯心史观方法论的典型{"}范武{"}。他把根本经济制度与经济管理体制混淆起来,抓住传统计划产品经济管理体制上的缺陷,大讲社会主义根本制度的不合理,矛头直指宪法关于维护社会主义公有制的规定,有很大的破坏性。他从反面提出的关于节约公有资源、降低管理制度成本等经济制度方面的问题,未必不值得人们重视。",
keywords = "historical idealism, historical materialism, economic institution, transaction costs, 唯心史观, 唯物史观, 经济制度, 交易成本",
author = "Ganqiang He",
year = "2003",
language = "Chinese (Simplified)",
volume = "1",
pages = "159--175",
journal = "Journal of Economics of Shanghai School",
publisher = "上海财经大学海派经济学研究中心",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - 评张五常唯心史观的制度解释

AU - He, Ganqiang

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - 张五常先生所解释的经济制度,是入主观选择的经济组织,所谓"健全私有产权"论,就是私有制永恒论。他的交易成本与人的主观因素联系在一起,所以,由此解释的制度没有客观性。把市场关系和私有制的产生,都归结为交易成本,无疑是说交换关系中的消耗产生了市场,为了减少交换消耗而产生了私有产权,逻辑上说不通,也不符合历史事实。他用简单流通关系,完全替代和抹杀了企业制度中最基本、最深层的生产资料所有制产权关系。把每个人的收入极大化作为经济解释的中心假设,表明了他采用的,完全是传统资产阶级经济学的理论假设,与17世纪的"自然秩序"论、"社会契约"论如出一辙。他的整个论证是在私有制经济中兜圈子,是唯心史观方法论的典型"范武"。他把根本经济制度与经济管理体制混淆起来,抓住传统计划产品经济管理体制上的缺陷,大讲社会主义根本制度的不合理,矛头直指宪法关于维护社会主义公有制的规定,有很大的破坏性。他从反面提出的关于节约公有资源、降低管理制度成本等经济制度方面的问题,未必不值得人们重视。

AB - 张五常先生所解释的经济制度,是入主观选择的经济组织,所谓"健全私有产权"论,就是私有制永恒论。他的交易成本与人的主观因素联系在一起,所以,由此解释的制度没有客观性。把市场关系和私有制的产生,都归结为交易成本,无疑是说交换关系中的消耗产生了市场,为了减少交换消耗而产生了私有产权,逻辑上说不通,也不符合历史事实。他用简单流通关系,完全替代和抹杀了企业制度中最基本、最深层的生产资料所有制产权关系。把每个人的收入极大化作为经济解释的中心假设,表明了他采用的,完全是传统资产阶级经济学的理论假设,与17世纪的"自然秩序"论、"社会契约"论如出一辙。他的整个论证是在私有制经济中兜圈子,是唯心史观方法论的典型"范武"。他把根本经济制度与经济管理体制混淆起来,抓住传统计划产品经济管理体制上的缺陷,大讲社会主义根本制度的不合理,矛头直指宪法关于维护社会主义公有制的规定,有很大的破坏性。他从反面提出的关于节约公有资源、降低管理制度成本等经济制度方面的问题,未必不值得人们重视。

KW - historical idealism

KW - historical materialism

KW - economic institution

KW - transaction costs

KW - 唯心史观

KW - 唯物史观

KW - 经济制度

KW - 交易成本

M3 - 文章

VL - 1

SP - 159

EP - 175

JO - Journal of Economics of Shanghai School

JF - Journal of Economics of Shanghai School

IS - 3

ER -