关于我国经济学教学与研究的指导思想问题: 与晏智杰教授商榷

Translated title of the contribution: On the Problems of the Guiding Thought of China's Economics Teaching and Research: To Discuss with Prof. Yan Zhi-jie

奚 兆永

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper talks about the problems of the guiding thought of Chinia's economics teaching and research and criticizes the view of Prof. Yan Zhi-jie in his article Rethinking the Guiding Position of Martian Economics. This paper holds that is has been prescribed in the Constitution that Marxism is our guiding thought, so advocating "paying equal attention to the two thoughts", "coexistence of two bases" and pluralism of guiding thoughts is actually to replace Marxian economics with capitalist economics, opposing to "insisting on the guiding position of traditional Marxian economics blindly" is actually to make the so-called traditional Marxism opposed to contemporary Marxism and to deny the root and source of Marxism and deny the basic principles and methods of Marxism and finally to deny the guiding position of Marxism radically. This paper also criticizes Prof. Yan's different bases for his view point that the so一called traditional Marxism can't be the guiding thought.
Original languageChinese (Simplified)
Pages (from-to)177-189
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Economics of Shanghai School
Volume5
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Economics
China
Teaching
Marxism
Thought
Pluralism
Coexistence
Constitution

Keywords

  • Marxian economics
  • capitalist economics
  • tradition
  • contemporary

Cite this

关于我国经济学教学与研究的指导思想问题 : 与晏智杰教授商榷. / 奚兆永.

In: Journal of Economics of Shanghai School, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2007, p. 177-189.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{53d313b725924ecd95b5816b4f9a5aa2,
title = "关于我国经济学教学与研究的指导思想问题: 与晏智杰教授商榷",
abstract = "本文对我国经济学教学和研究中存在的指导思想问题发表了看法,对晏智杰教授《马克思主义经济学的指导地位的再思考》一文的观点提出了批评的意见。文章认为,马克思主义作为指导思想是写进了宪法的,在经济学领域提倡{"}两家并重{"}、{"}两个基础并存{"},主张指导思想的多元化,实际上就是要用资产阶级经济学取代马克思主义经济学;提出反对{"}一味坚持传统马克思主义经济学的指导地位{"},就是把所谓的传统马克思主义和当代马克思主义割裂开来并且对立起来,否定马克思主义的根和源,否定马克思主义的基本原理和基本方法,实际上是要从根本上否定马克思主义的指导地位。文章还批驳了晏文认为所谓传统的马克思主义不能成为指导思想的种种{"}根据{"}。",
keywords = "Marxian economics, capitalist economics, tradition, contemporary, 马克思主义经济学, 资产阶级经济学, 传统, 当代",
author = "兆永 奚",
year = "2007",
language = "Chinese (Simplified)",
volume = "5",
pages = "177--189",
journal = "Journal of Economics of Shanghai School",
publisher = "上海财经大学海派经济学研究中心",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - 关于我国经济学教学与研究的指导思想问题

T2 - 与晏智杰教授商榷

AU - 奚, 兆永

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - 本文对我国经济学教学和研究中存在的指导思想问题发表了看法,对晏智杰教授《马克思主义经济学的指导地位的再思考》一文的观点提出了批评的意见。文章认为,马克思主义作为指导思想是写进了宪法的,在经济学领域提倡"两家并重"、"两个基础并存",主张指导思想的多元化,实际上就是要用资产阶级经济学取代马克思主义经济学;提出反对"一味坚持传统马克思主义经济学的指导地位",就是把所谓的传统马克思主义和当代马克思主义割裂开来并且对立起来,否定马克思主义的根和源,否定马克思主义的基本原理和基本方法,实际上是要从根本上否定马克思主义的指导地位。文章还批驳了晏文认为所谓传统的马克思主义不能成为指导思想的种种"根据"。

AB - 本文对我国经济学教学和研究中存在的指导思想问题发表了看法,对晏智杰教授《马克思主义经济学的指导地位的再思考》一文的观点提出了批评的意见。文章认为,马克思主义作为指导思想是写进了宪法的,在经济学领域提倡"两家并重"、"两个基础并存",主张指导思想的多元化,实际上就是要用资产阶级经济学取代马克思主义经济学;提出反对"一味坚持传统马克思主义经济学的指导地位",就是把所谓的传统马克思主义和当代马克思主义割裂开来并且对立起来,否定马克思主义的根和源,否定马克思主义的基本原理和基本方法,实际上是要从根本上否定马克思主义的指导地位。文章还批驳了晏文认为所谓传统的马克思主义不能成为指导思想的种种"根据"。

KW - Marxian economics

KW - capitalist economics

KW - tradition

KW - contemporary

KW - 马克思主义经济学

KW - 资产阶级经济学

KW - 传统

KW - 当代

M3 - 文章

VL - 5

SP - 177

EP - 189

JO - Journal of Economics of Shanghai School

JF - Journal of Economics of Shanghai School

IS - 1

ER -