申论政治经济学的研究对象

答胡世祯、郭冠清并论“生产关系与交换关系”的翻译

Translated title of the contribution: On the Research Subject of Political Economic: to Reply to Hu Shi-zhen and Guo "Guang-qing and Comment on the Translation of Production Relations and Communication Relations"

奚 兆永

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This essay pits forward different opinions from those of HU Shizhen and GUO Guanqing and responds to their criticism This essay holds that views of Lenin and Stalin and ideas of Marx and Engels are consistent instead of contradictory. The author further discusses the concept of "production method" and relevant theories of Marx and Engels and comments on the translation of Productions-und Verkehtsverhaltnisse.
Original languageChinese (Simplified)
Pages (from-to)156-172
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Economics of Shanghai School
Volume2
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

relations of production
production method
communication
economics
criticism

Keywords

  • political economics
  • research subject
  • production method
  • production relations
  • communication relations

Cite this

申论政治经济学的研究对象 : 答胡世祯、郭冠清并论“生产关系与交换关系”的翻译. / 奚兆永.

In: Journal of Economics of Shanghai School, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2004, p. 156-172.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2f839748cec042cc9295edd2e1a06b26,
title = "申论政治经济学的研究对象: 答胡世祯、郭冠清并论“生产关系与交换关系”的翻译",
abstract = "本文对胡世祯、郭冠清两位同志的观点提出了不同意见,并回答了他们对拙文的非难。文章认为,列宁、斯大林(下简称列斯)的观点和马克思、恩格斯(下简称马恩)的观点是一脉相承的,是马克思恩格斯而非列宁斯大林是没有根据的。文章对{"}生产方式{"}的概念和马恩的有关原理进一步进行了讨论,并对Produktions-und Verkehtsverhaltnisse的翻译发表了看法,认为将其译为{"}生产条件和交换条件{"}是不可取的,主张将其译为{"}生产关系和交往关系{"}。",
keywords = "political economics, research subject, production method, production relations, communication relations, 政治经济学, 研究对象, 生产方式, 生产关系, 交往关系",
author = "兆永 奚",
year = "2004",
language = "Chinese (Simplified)",
volume = "2",
pages = "156--172",
journal = "Journal of Economics of Shanghai School",
publisher = "上海财经大学海派经济学研究中心",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - 申论政治经济学的研究对象

T2 - 答胡世祯、郭冠清并论“生产关系与交换关系”的翻译

AU - 奚, 兆永

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - 本文对胡世祯、郭冠清两位同志的观点提出了不同意见,并回答了他们对拙文的非难。文章认为,列宁、斯大林(下简称列斯)的观点和马克思、恩格斯(下简称马恩)的观点是一脉相承的,是马克思恩格斯而非列宁斯大林是没有根据的。文章对"生产方式"的概念和马恩的有关原理进一步进行了讨论,并对Produktions-und Verkehtsverhaltnisse的翻译发表了看法,认为将其译为"生产条件和交换条件"是不可取的,主张将其译为"生产关系和交往关系"。

AB - 本文对胡世祯、郭冠清两位同志的观点提出了不同意见,并回答了他们对拙文的非难。文章认为,列宁、斯大林(下简称列斯)的观点和马克思、恩格斯(下简称马恩)的观点是一脉相承的,是马克思恩格斯而非列宁斯大林是没有根据的。文章对"生产方式"的概念和马恩的有关原理进一步进行了讨论,并对Produktions-und Verkehtsverhaltnisse的翻译发表了看法,认为将其译为"生产条件和交换条件"是不可取的,主张将其译为"生产关系和交往关系"。

KW - political economics

KW - research subject

KW - production method

KW - production relations

KW - communication relations

KW - 政治经济学

KW - 研究对象

KW - 生产方式

KW - 生产关系

KW - 交往关系

M3 - 文章

VL - 2

SP - 156

EP - 172

JO - Journal of Economics of Shanghai School

JF - Journal of Economics of Shanghai School

IS - 2

ER -