回到斯密,还是要回到马克思?

Translated title of the contribution: Return to Adam Smith,or to Return to Marx?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Both Yifu Lin and Weiying Zhang advocate returning to Smith. Weiying Zhang insist the opinions of Adam Smith' s liberalization,marketization, privatization, but put side historical limitations of Smith' s ideas .This is what we are firmly against. Yifu Lin favorite is the method of Smith's An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations,but he don't understand that the method is duality, conflict, non-historical,and that the method is not suitable for the actual situation of contemporary China. Now, we must be going back to Marx’s standpoint, viewpoint and method, which is the only guiding ideology. Marx' s standpoint, viewpoint and method can guide the construction of the socialist market economy in contemporary China, and explain local phenomena in the development of market economy.
Original languageChinese (Simplified)
Pages (from-to)11-21
Number of pages11
Journal海派经济学
Volume15
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

market economy
China
privatization
liberalization
ideology
cause

Keywords

  • Contemporary China
  • Guiding Ideology
  • Return to Marx

Cite this

回到斯密,还是要回到马克思? / Chen, Junming.

In: 海派经济学, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2017, p. 11-21.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chen, Junming. / 回到斯密,还是要回到马克思?. In: 海派经济学. 2017 ; Vol. 15, No. 2. pp. 11-21.
@article{314e669b98c2413a828b8d414607addd,
title = "回到斯密,还是要回到马克思?",
abstract = "林毅夫和张维迎都主张回到斯密。但张维迎中意的是斯密的自由化、市场化、私有化,而且完全撇开斯密观点的历史局限性,这恰恰是我们现在要坚决反对的。林毅夫中意的是斯密《国民财富的性质和原因研究》的方法,但他却不懂得这种方法是二元且对立的,非历史的,完全不适合当代中国的实际情况。现在我们必须回到马克思的立场、观点和方法上,只有它才是唯一正确的指导思想,才能指导当代中国的社会主义市场经济建设,解释市场经济发展过程中的地方现象。",
keywords = "Contemporary China, Guiding Ideology, Return to Marx, 当代中国, 指导思想, 回到马克思",
author = "Junming Chen",
year = "2017",
language = "Chinese (Simplified)",
volume = "15",
pages = "11--21",
journal = "Journal of Economics of Shanghai School",
publisher = "上海财经大学海派经济学研究中心",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - 回到斯密,还是要回到马克思?

AU - Chen, Junming

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - 林毅夫和张维迎都主张回到斯密。但张维迎中意的是斯密的自由化、市场化、私有化,而且完全撇开斯密观点的历史局限性,这恰恰是我们现在要坚决反对的。林毅夫中意的是斯密《国民财富的性质和原因研究》的方法,但他却不懂得这种方法是二元且对立的,非历史的,完全不适合当代中国的实际情况。现在我们必须回到马克思的立场、观点和方法上,只有它才是唯一正确的指导思想,才能指导当代中国的社会主义市场经济建设,解释市场经济发展过程中的地方现象。

AB - 林毅夫和张维迎都主张回到斯密。但张维迎中意的是斯密的自由化、市场化、私有化,而且完全撇开斯密观点的历史局限性,这恰恰是我们现在要坚决反对的。林毅夫中意的是斯密《国民财富的性质和原因研究》的方法,但他却不懂得这种方法是二元且对立的,非历史的,完全不适合当代中国的实际情况。现在我们必须回到马克思的立场、观点和方法上,只有它才是唯一正确的指导思想,才能指导当代中国的社会主义市场经济建设,解释市场经济发展过程中的地方现象。

KW - Contemporary China

KW - Guiding Ideology

KW - Return to Marx

KW - 当代中国

KW - 指导思想

KW - 回到马克思

M3 - 文章

VL - 15

SP - 11

EP - 21

JO - Journal of Economics of Shanghai School

JF - Journal of Economics of Shanghai School

IS - 2

ER -