按照马克思思想研究斯拉法

答斯蒂德曼

Translated title of the contribution: Studying Piero Sraffa in accordance with Marxist Thought: Reply to Ian Steedman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

50 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Ian Steedman has always paraded that he thinks highly of the decisive effect of condition of material production and real wage, but he did not take into account the condition of material production when establishing the physical relation equation. In fact, in the process of establishing the physical relation equation, combination of iron and labour was made by Ian Steedmanat's own will, which could produce any material indifferent quantity. The physical equation, which is listed according to product variety chose at will and product quantity selected wilfully, would be arbitrary, and it has no relation with the real economic activity. Because physical relation equation could be untenable, which value relation deduced by must be wrong. In Ian Steedman's model of value transformation, rate of profit has no definition, so what is called rate of profit is only a rate at which product is sold above its value, and it is completely irrelevant to Marxist profit rate. Researching Ian Steedman according to Marxist thought, labor value theory is the theory which is not unnecessary, and should not be abandoned, on the contrary, the analysis of Ian Steedman further counselled people as a negative example: It is imminent to get a deeper comprehension to Marxist labor value theory.
Original languageChinese (Simplified)
Pages (from-to)164-179
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Economics of Shanghai School
Volume1
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2003

Fingerprint

labor
products
economics
iron

Keywords

  • Real Economic Relationship
  • Rate of Profit
  • Economic Transition
  • The Labor-value Theory

Cite this

按照马克思思想研究斯拉法 : 答斯蒂德曼. / Ding, Baojun.

In: Journal of Economics of Shanghai School, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2003, p. 164-179.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ac4f089027f840a8affe8533c14627e0,
title = "按照马克思思想研究斯拉法: 答斯蒂德曼",
abstract = "斯蒂德曼虽一直标榜自己重视物质生产条件和实际工资的决定作用,但斯蒂德曼在确定实物关系方程式时却丝毫也不顾及什么物质生产条件。事实上,在实物关系方程的建立过程中,斯蒂德曼可以随意让铁和劳动在生产中结合,可以随意让它生产出任何量的不同的任何物质。根据这样随意选出的产品品种和任意选择的产品数量所列出的实物方程也是任意的,它和现实经济生活没有任何关系。由于斯蒂德曼的实物关系方程不能成立,所以,由此所推出的价值关系必然是错误的。在斯蒂德曼的价值转化模型中利润率r是没有定义的,他所谓的利润率不过是商品高于价值出售的一个高出率,他和马克思科学的利润率毫不相干。按照马克思的思想来研究斯蒂德曼,劳动价值论不仅不是多余的、必须放弃的理论,而且,恰恰相反,通过对斯蒂德曼这一反面教材的分析,进一步警示人们:深化对马克思劳动价值论的认识刻不容缓!",
keywords = "实物关系方程, 利润率, 转形, 劳动价值论, Real Economic Relationship, Rate of Profit, Economic Transition, The Labor-value Theory",
author = "Baojun Ding",
year = "2003",
language = "Chinese (Simplified)",
volume = "1",
pages = "164--179",
journal = "Journal of Economics of Shanghai School",
publisher = "上海财经大学海派经济学研究中心",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - 按照马克思思想研究斯拉法

T2 - 答斯蒂德曼

AU - Ding, Baojun

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - 斯蒂德曼虽一直标榜自己重视物质生产条件和实际工资的决定作用,但斯蒂德曼在确定实物关系方程式时却丝毫也不顾及什么物质生产条件。事实上,在实物关系方程的建立过程中,斯蒂德曼可以随意让铁和劳动在生产中结合,可以随意让它生产出任何量的不同的任何物质。根据这样随意选出的产品品种和任意选择的产品数量所列出的实物方程也是任意的,它和现实经济生活没有任何关系。由于斯蒂德曼的实物关系方程不能成立,所以,由此所推出的价值关系必然是错误的。在斯蒂德曼的价值转化模型中利润率r是没有定义的,他所谓的利润率不过是商品高于价值出售的一个高出率,他和马克思科学的利润率毫不相干。按照马克思的思想来研究斯蒂德曼,劳动价值论不仅不是多余的、必须放弃的理论,而且,恰恰相反,通过对斯蒂德曼这一反面教材的分析,进一步警示人们:深化对马克思劳动价值论的认识刻不容缓!

AB - 斯蒂德曼虽一直标榜自己重视物质生产条件和实际工资的决定作用,但斯蒂德曼在确定实物关系方程式时却丝毫也不顾及什么物质生产条件。事实上,在实物关系方程的建立过程中,斯蒂德曼可以随意让铁和劳动在生产中结合,可以随意让它生产出任何量的不同的任何物质。根据这样随意选出的产品品种和任意选择的产品数量所列出的实物方程也是任意的,它和现实经济生活没有任何关系。由于斯蒂德曼的实物关系方程不能成立,所以,由此所推出的价值关系必然是错误的。在斯蒂德曼的价值转化模型中利润率r是没有定义的,他所谓的利润率不过是商品高于价值出售的一个高出率,他和马克思科学的利润率毫不相干。按照马克思的思想来研究斯蒂德曼,劳动价值论不仅不是多余的、必须放弃的理论,而且,恰恰相反,通过对斯蒂德曼这一反面教材的分析,进一步警示人们:深化对马克思劳动价值论的认识刻不容缓!

KW - 实物关系方程

KW - 利润率

KW - 转形

KW - 劳动价值论

KW - Real Economic Relationship

KW - Rate of Profit

KW - Economic Transition

KW - The Labor-value Theory

M3 - 文章

VL - 1

SP - 164

EP - 179

JO - Journal of Economics of Shanghai School

JF - Journal of Economics of Shanghai School

IS - 1

ER -