当前“国进民退”之说不能成立

兼评“国进民退”之争

Translated title of the contribution: The Current Theory on "State-owned Enterprises to Enter Exit" Can Not Established: Comment on the Dispute About "State-owned Enterprises to enter and Private Enterprises Exit"

Xinghua Wei, 张 福军

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In recent years the theoretical circle emerges the dispute about "State-owned enterprises to enter and private enterprises exit". Some severely criticize, some agree to support, some believe that there is not the fact "State-owned enterprises to enter and private enterprises exit", and some claim there is only a partial
selective but not national policy. This article thinks that this argument is untenable. In fact, "State-owned enterprises to enter and private enterprises exit" and "State-owned enterprises to enter and private enterprises exit" are the same reference to a strategic and overall orientation and trend. Whether from the
western developed countries to cope with the international financial crisis for the implementation of some of nationalization measures, from the direction for current macroeconomic policy, from the development trend and the proportion of growth and decline between the state-owned and private enterprises, from the
operational level of the running of the market-oriented economy, or from the accuracy of a theoretical logic and thesis, the so-called "State-owned enterprises to enter and private enterprises exit" is a subjective assertion lack of scientific basis.
Original languageChinese (Simplified)
Pages (from-to)5-11+159
Number of pages8
Journal马克思主义研究
Issue number03
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Private enterprise
Exit
State-owned enterprises
Dispute
Proportion
Financial crisis
Developed countries
Logic
Nationalization
Macroeconomic policy

Cite this

当前“国进民退”之说不能成立 : 兼评“国进民退”之争. / Wei, Xinghua; 张福军.

In: 马克思主义研究 , No. 03, 2010, p. 5-11+159.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8e64580b8d0648be9a3923e3a9696667,
title = "当前“国进民退”之说不能成立: 兼评“国进民退”之争",
abstract = "近年来理论界出现了{"}国进民退{"}之争。本文对{"}国进民退{"}之说提出质疑,认为无论对其反对或赞同,{"}国进民退{"}之说都难以成立,事实上,{"}国进民退{"}同{"}国退民进{"}的提法一样,都是指一种战略性和全局性的取向与发展趋势。无论从西方发达国家为应对国际金融危机实行某些国有化的措施看,从国家现行宏观政策取向看,从国企和私企的发展趋势及其比重消长看,从市场经济运行的操作层面看,还是从理论逻辑与论断的准确性看,所谓{"}国进民退{"}都是缺乏科学依据的一种主观论断。",
keywords = "国进民退, 国退民进, 市场经济, 金融危机",
author = "Xinghua Wei and 福军 张",
year = "2010",
language = "Chinese (Simplified)",
pages = "5--11+159",
journal = "马克思主义研究",
issn = "1006-5199",
number = "03",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - 当前“国进民退”之说不能成立

T2 - 兼评“国进民退”之争

AU - Wei, Xinghua

AU - 张, 福军

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - 近年来理论界出现了"国进民退"之争。本文对"国进民退"之说提出质疑,认为无论对其反对或赞同,"国进民退"之说都难以成立,事实上,"国进民退"同"国退民进"的提法一样,都是指一种战略性和全局性的取向与发展趋势。无论从西方发达国家为应对国际金融危机实行某些国有化的措施看,从国家现行宏观政策取向看,从国企和私企的发展趋势及其比重消长看,从市场经济运行的操作层面看,还是从理论逻辑与论断的准确性看,所谓"国进民退"都是缺乏科学依据的一种主观论断。

AB - 近年来理论界出现了"国进民退"之争。本文对"国进民退"之说提出质疑,认为无论对其反对或赞同,"国进民退"之说都难以成立,事实上,"国进民退"同"国退民进"的提法一样,都是指一种战略性和全局性的取向与发展趋势。无论从西方发达国家为应对国际金融危机实行某些国有化的措施看,从国家现行宏观政策取向看,从国企和私企的发展趋势及其比重消长看,从市场经济运行的操作层面看,还是从理论逻辑与论断的准确性看,所谓"国进民退"都是缺乏科学依据的一种主观论断。

KW - 国进民退

KW - 国退民进

KW - 市场经济

KW - 金融危机

M3 - 文章

SP - 5-11+159

JO - 马克思主义研究

JF - 马克思主义研究

SN - 1006-5199

IS - 03

ER -