转型期中俄国家制度能力的实证分析

兼论后危机时代的战略选择

Translated title of the contribution: The Empirical Analysis of Chinese and Russia State Institutional Capacities in Transitional Period: And on the Strategic Choice of Post-Crisis Era

黄 秋菊, 景 维民

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Although Russia's radical change of institutions has disintegrated the highly centralized state's governance Mode of Totalism, it led to the failure of the coordination of the three main governance mechanism(government, market and society) and pushed Russia into the state of order-fragmentation. As a result, Russia experienced serious social turbulence and economic decline. Under the domination of the "strong government",China has effectively altered the social一economic institutions, and enhanced the state institutional capacities in the inter一coordination among government,market and society. The ultimate effect was a persistent, rapid and steady promotion of social economic development. Studying the transitional issues from the view of state institutional capacities can not only give a more comprehensive and reasonable explanation to the transition mysteries of Russia and China, but also has important instructive meanings to the choice of state's governance strategies in the deepening period of transition.
Original languageChinese (Simplified)
Pages (from-to)38-48
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Economics of Shanghai School
Volume10
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Russia
governance
China
market
domination
social economics
fragmentation
promotion
economics
Society

Keywords

  • State Institutional Capacities
  • Post-Crisis Era
  • Transition
  • China
  • Russia

Cite this

转型期中俄国家制度能力的实证分析 : 兼论后危机时代的战略选择. / 黄秋菊; 景维民.

In: Journal of Economics of Shanghai School, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2012, p. 38-48.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{80db105b5acb422d9c4ad7bee63594b8,
title = "转型期中俄国家制度能力的实证分析: 兼论后危机时代的战略选择",
abstract = "俄罗斯的激进制度变革虽然瓦解了高度集权的全能主义国家制度形态,却导致了政府、市场与社会三大制度机制的协调失灵,从而陷入秩序分裂状态之中,结果引发了严重的社会动荡与经济衰退。中国在{"}强政府{"}的主导下对社会经济制度进行有效改造,在政府、市场及社会三者的互动协调中强化了国家制度能力,从而促进了社会经济的持续、快速、稳定发展。从国家制度能力理论框架的视角来研究转型问题,不仅可以对中、俄两国的转型之谜作出更为全面合理的解读,而且对于后金融危机时代国家治理方略的选择也具有重要的指导意义。",
keywords = "State Institutional Capacities, Post-Crisis Era, Transition, China, Russia, 国家制度能力, 后危机时代, 转型, 中国, 俄罗斯",
author = "秋菊 黄 and 维民 景",
year = "2012",
language = "Chinese (Simplified)",
volume = "10",
pages = "38--48",
journal = "Journal of Economics of Shanghai School",
publisher = "上海财经大学海派经济学研究中心",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - 转型期中俄国家制度能力的实证分析

T2 - 兼论后危机时代的战略选择

AU - 黄, 秋菊

AU - 景, 维民

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - 俄罗斯的激进制度变革虽然瓦解了高度集权的全能主义国家制度形态,却导致了政府、市场与社会三大制度机制的协调失灵,从而陷入秩序分裂状态之中,结果引发了严重的社会动荡与经济衰退。中国在"强政府"的主导下对社会经济制度进行有效改造,在政府、市场及社会三者的互动协调中强化了国家制度能力,从而促进了社会经济的持续、快速、稳定发展。从国家制度能力理论框架的视角来研究转型问题,不仅可以对中、俄两国的转型之谜作出更为全面合理的解读,而且对于后金融危机时代国家治理方略的选择也具有重要的指导意义。

AB - 俄罗斯的激进制度变革虽然瓦解了高度集权的全能主义国家制度形态,却导致了政府、市场与社会三大制度机制的协调失灵,从而陷入秩序分裂状态之中,结果引发了严重的社会动荡与经济衰退。中国在"强政府"的主导下对社会经济制度进行有效改造,在政府、市场及社会三者的互动协调中强化了国家制度能力,从而促进了社会经济的持续、快速、稳定发展。从国家制度能力理论框架的视角来研究转型问题,不仅可以对中、俄两国的转型之谜作出更为全面合理的解读,而且对于后金融危机时代国家治理方略的选择也具有重要的指导意义。

KW - State Institutional Capacities

KW - Post-Crisis Era

KW - Transition

KW - China

KW - Russia

KW - 国家制度能力

KW - 后危机时代

KW - 转型

KW - 中国

KW - 俄罗斯

M3 - 文章

VL - 10

SP - 38

EP - 48

JO - Journal of Economics of Shanghai School

JF - Journal of Economics of Shanghai School

IS - 1

ER -