“国进民退”争论的兴起与升级、焦点与实质

Translated title of the contribution: The Rise of Controversy and Upgrades, the Focus and Substance of "The State Advances as the Private Sector Retreats"

冷 兆松

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

There are several statements about rising time of "The state advances as the private sector retreats" and this article believe it should rise in 2001,ranked as the focus of public opinion in 2009 and upgrade to be the academic focus in 2010. The major controversy focused primarily on two issues, one is the authenticity and the scale of "The state advances as the private sector retreats",the second is relationship between the basic economic system and the reform and opening up and "The state advances as the private sector retreats" .The essence of debate is whether to uphold and improve the basic economic system of socialism with Chinese characteristics or oppose and'weaken the basic economic system, whether adhere to and develop the socialist public ownership or shaken and weakened public ownership:CPC eighteen fully reaffirmed their commitment to accelerate the improvement of public ownership, dominant and diverse forms of ownership to develop the basic economic system and fully reaffirmed its adherence to the "two unwavering" policy advocated which is called "the country back into" speculation and attacks clear response.
Original languageChinese (Simplified)
Pages (from-to)44-54
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Economics of Shanghai School
Volume11
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

economic system
private sector
speculation
socialism
authenticity
public opinion
commitment
reform

Keywords

  • The State Advances as the Private Sector Retreats
  • Controversy
  • Rise
  • Upgrade
  • Focus
  • Essence

Cite this

“国进民退”争论的兴起与升级、焦点与实质. / 冷兆松.

In: Journal of Economics of Shanghai School, Vol. 11, No. 3, 2013, p. 44-54.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b3547bcf0b524e958afd1cdcf9dc12ef,
title = "“国进民退”争论的兴起与升级、焦点与实质",
abstract = "关于{"}国进民退{"}争论兴起的时间有多种说法,经本文考证应该是2001年。该争论在2009年跃居为舆论焦点,在2010年升级为学术热点。10多年来,争论的重大分歧主要聚焦在两个问题上:一是{"}国进民退{"}的真伪与规模的问题,二是{"}国进民退{"}与基本经济制度和改革开放关系的问题。争论的实质是,坚持和完善中国特色社会主义基本经济制度还是反对和削弱这个基本经济制度,坚持和发展社会主义公有制还是动摇和削弱公有制。中共十八大全面重申要加快完善公有制为主体、多种所有制经济共同发展的基本经济制度,全面重申坚持{"}两个毫不动摇{"}的政策主张,这是对所谓{"}国进民退{"}炒作的明确回应。",
keywords = "The State Advances as the Private Sector Retreats, Controversy, Rise, Upgrade, Focus, Essence, “国进民退”, 争论, 兴起, 升级, 焦点, 实质",
author = "兆松 冷",
year = "2013",
language = "Chinese (Simplified)",
volume = "11",
pages = "44--54",
journal = "Journal of Economics of Shanghai School",
publisher = "上海财经大学海派经济学研究中心",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - “国进民退”争论的兴起与升级、焦点与实质

AU - 冷, 兆松

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - 关于"国进民退"争论兴起的时间有多种说法,经本文考证应该是2001年。该争论在2009年跃居为舆论焦点,在2010年升级为学术热点。10多年来,争论的重大分歧主要聚焦在两个问题上:一是"国进民退"的真伪与规模的问题,二是"国进民退"与基本经济制度和改革开放关系的问题。争论的实质是,坚持和完善中国特色社会主义基本经济制度还是反对和削弱这个基本经济制度,坚持和发展社会主义公有制还是动摇和削弱公有制。中共十八大全面重申要加快完善公有制为主体、多种所有制经济共同发展的基本经济制度,全面重申坚持"两个毫不动摇"的政策主张,这是对所谓"国进民退"炒作的明确回应。

AB - 关于"国进民退"争论兴起的时间有多种说法,经本文考证应该是2001年。该争论在2009年跃居为舆论焦点,在2010年升级为学术热点。10多年来,争论的重大分歧主要聚焦在两个问题上:一是"国进民退"的真伪与规模的问题,二是"国进民退"与基本经济制度和改革开放关系的问题。争论的实质是,坚持和完善中国特色社会主义基本经济制度还是反对和削弱这个基本经济制度,坚持和发展社会主义公有制还是动摇和削弱公有制。中共十八大全面重申要加快完善公有制为主体、多种所有制经济共同发展的基本经济制度,全面重申坚持"两个毫不动摇"的政策主张,这是对所谓"国进民退"炒作的明确回应。

KW - The State Advances as the Private Sector Retreats

KW - Controversy

KW - Rise

KW - Upgrade

KW - Focus

KW - Essence

KW - “国进民退”

KW - 争论

KW - 兴起

KW - 升级

KW - 焦点

KW - 实质

M3 - 文章

VL - 11

SP - 44

EP - 54

JO - Journal of Economics of Shanghai School

JF - Journal of Economics of Shanghai School

IS - 3

ER -