国有企业效率评价理论检视

新自由主义观点批判

Translated title of the contribution: Theoretical Analysis on State-owned Enterprise's Efficiency: A Criticism of Neo-liberalism

伍 山林

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In the paper I use mathematical method to criticize the viewpoint of neo-liberalism and to examine the efficiency evaluation of stateowned enterprises. State-owned enterprise possesses not only micro objective but also non-micro objective which is decided by its political nature. Among the objective system, the non-micro objective embodies the essential characteristics, and it is multifarious and time-varying. Neo-liberal economists ignore the value of non-micro objective, so that they draw some incorrect conclusions, for example, state-owned enterprise is inefficient at micro level and useless at macro level. In the capital market and labor market, state-owned enterprises and non-state-owned enterprises have their asymmetric advantage, respectively. Neo-liberal economists emphasize one aspect and neglect another aspect simultaneously, so that their viewpoint of efficiency evaluation is deceptive.The position in the industry influences the efficiency of the enterprise, but the effect is sometimes multifarious. So, the theory advocated by liberalism economists, i.e. , state-owned enterprise's efficiency is only from its monopoly position, is unscientific and unfair.
Original languageChinese (Simplified)
Pages (from-to)63-75
Number of pages13
Journal海派经济学
Volume15
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Criticism
State-owned enterprises
Theoretical analysis
Neoliberalism
Economists
Evaluation
Neglect
Liberalism
Industry
Capital markets
Labour market
Monopoly
Time-varying

Keywords

  • State-owned Enterprise
  • Efficiency Evaluation
  • Non-micro Objective
  • Position in the Industry

Cite this

国有企业效率评价理论检视 : 新自由主义观点批判. / 伍山林.

In: 海派经济学, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2017, p. 63-75.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

伍山林. / 国有企业效率评价理论检视 : 新自由主义观点批判. In: 海派经济学. 2017 ; Vol. 15, No. 2. pp. 63-75.
@article{ea360530b3eb4cba8aea224ea16da5ae,
title = "国有企业效率评价理论检视: 新自由主义观点批判",
abstract = "本文认为可以采用数理经济学方法批判新自由主义观点,并且对国有企业效率评价做出理论检视。国有企业性质决定了它既具有微观目标又具有超微观目标。其中超微观目标体现本质特征,它具有多样性和时变性。新自由主义经济学家无视超微观目标的价值,给出了国有企业微观低效论和国有企业宏观无用论等错误结论。在资本市场与劳动市场上,国有企业与非国有企业各有其非对称优势。新自由主义经济学家对国有企业进行效率评价时,强调一个方面而忽视另一个方面,给出了具有欺骗性的结论。企业在行业中的地位对微观效率的影响有时具有多样性,新自由主义经济学家的垄断效率论既不科学,又欠公允。",
keywords = "State-owned Enterprise, Efficiency Evaluation, Non-micro Objective, Position in the Industry, 国有企业, 效率评价, 超微观目标, 行业特征",
author = "山林 伍",
year = "2017",
language = "Chinese (Simplified)",
volume = "15",
pages = "63--75",
journal = "Journal of Economics of Shanghai School",
publisher = "上海财经大学海派经济学研究中心",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - 国有企业效率评价理论检视

T2 - 新自由主义观点批判

AU - 伍, 山林

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - 本文认为可以采用数理经济学方法批判新自由主义观点,并且对国有企业效率评价做出理论检视。国有企业性质决定了它既具有微观目标又具有超微观目标。其中超微观目标体现本质特征,它具有多样性和时变性。新自由主义经济学家无视超微观目标的价值,给出了国有企业微观低效论和国有企业宏观无用论等错误结论。在资本市场与劳动市场上,国有企业与非国有企业各有其非对称优势。新自由主义经济学家对国有企业进行效率评价时,强调一个方面而忽视另一个方面,给出了具有欺骗性的结论。企业在行业中的地位对微观效率的影响有时具有多样性,新自由主义经济学家的垄断效率论既不科学,又欠公允。

AB - 本文认为可以采用数理经济学方法批判新自由主义观点,并且对国有企业效率评价做出理论检视。国有企业性质决定了它既具有微观目标又具有超微观目标。其中超微观目标体现本质特征,它具有多样性和时变性。新自由主义经济学家无视超微观目标的价值,给出了国有企业微观低效论和国有企业宏观无用论等错误结论。在资本市场与劳动市场上,国有企业与非国有企业各有其非对称优势。新自由主义经济学家对国有企业进行效率评价时,强调一个方面而忽视另一个方面,给出了具有欺骗性的结论。企业在行业中的地位对微观效率的影响有时具有多样性,新自由主义经济学家的垄断效率论既不科学,又欠公允。

KW - State-owned Enterprise

KW - Efficiency Evaluation

KW - Non-micro Objective

KW - Position in the Industry

KW - 国有企业

KW - 效率评价

KW - 超微观目标

KW - 行业特征

M3 - 文章

VL - 15

SP - 63

EP - 75

JO - Journal of Economics of Shanghai School

JF - Journal of Economics of Shanghai School

IS - 2

ER -