What is the Problem with Neoclassical Price Theory?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

"The article seeks to focus attention on Neoclassical price theory, as one of the two
problematic foundations of modern mainstream economics—the other being the theory of
distribution. After outlining what is understood to be Neoclassical price theory and noting the
various criticisms which it has been subject to from both within and without the school, the
article proceeds to argue that its major flaws need to be understood as stemming from how it
conceives of the formation of prices in the first instance. Specifically, the article argues that the
basic problem with the Neoclassical theory of price is that it abstracts from both production and
money in the first instance, such that when these are eventually brought back into the explanation
of price it is done so in an inessential manner; one where production and money have no bearing
on the findings of the analysis of price which excluded them."
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)457-477
Number of pages21
JournalWorld Review of Political Economy
Volume3
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Price theory
Criticism
Neoclassical theory

Keywords

  • price
  • relative price
  • money
  • equilibrium

Cite this

What is the Problem with Neoclassical Price Theory? / Nicholas, Howard.

In: World Review of Political Economy, Vol. 3, No. 4, 2012, p. 457-477.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{58ba9c3053f9460bb4acfcd095c29e78,
title = "What is the Problem with Neoclassical Price Theory?",
abstract = "{"}The article seeks to focus attention on Neoclassical price theory, as one of the twoproblematic foundations of modern mainstream economics—the other being the theory ofdistribution. After outlining what is understood to be Neoclassical price theory and noting thevarious criticisms which it has been subject to from both within and without the school, thearticle proceeds to argue that its major flaws need to be understood as stemming from how itconceives of the formation of prices in the first instance. Specifically, the article argues that thebasic problem with the Neoclassical theory of price is that it abstracts from both production andmoney in the first instance, such that when these are eventually brought back into the explanationof price it is done so in an inessential manner; one where production and money have no bearingon the findings of the analysis of price which excluded them.{"}",
keywords = "price, relative price, money, equilibrium",
author = "Howard Nicholas",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "457--477",
journal = "World Review of Political Economy",
issn = "2042-891X",
publisher = "Pluto Journals",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What is the Problem with Neoclassical Price Theory?

AU - Nicholas, Howard

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - "The article seeks to focus attention on Neoclassical price theory, as one of the twoproblematic foundations of modern mainstream economics—the other being the theory ofdistribution. After outlining what is understood to be Neoclassical price theory and noting thevarious criticisms which it has been subject to from both within and without the school, thearticle proceeds to argue that its major flaws need to be understood as stemming from how itconceives of the formation of prices in the first instance. Specifically, the article argues that thebasic problem with the Neoclassical theory of price is that it abstracts from both production andmoney in the first instance, such that when these are eventually brought back into the explanationof price it is done so in an inessential manner; one where production and money have no bearingon the findings of the analysis of price which excluded them."

AB - "The article seeks to focus attention on Neoclassical price theory, as one of the twoproblematic foundations of modern mainstream economics—the other being the theory ofdistribution. After outlining what is understood to be Neoclassical price theory and noting thevarious criticisms which it has been subject to from both within and without the school, thearticle proceeds to argue that its major flaws need to be understood as stemming from how itconceives of the formation of prices in the first instance. Specifically, the article argues that thebasic problem with the Neoclassical theory of price is that it abstracts from both production andmoney in the first instance, such that when these are eventually brought back into the explanationof price it is done so in an inessential manner; one where production and money have no bearingon the findings of the analysis of price which excluded them."

KW - price

KW - relative price

KW - money

KW - equilibrium

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 457

EP - 477

JO - World Review of Political Economy

JF - World Review of Political Economy

SN - 2042-891X

IS - 4

ER -