转形论争问题真实性考察: 兼与胡代光、马艳、白暴力、丁堡骏、余斌等商榷

曾 永寿

研究成果: Article

40 Downloads (Pure)

抄録

The problem of the transformation of the problem of the problem of Marx's argument has always been a hot issue, but it has been unable to reach a consensus. This paper puts forward the origin and basis of the problem of the transformation of the problem of the transfer, and concludes some representative scholars' viewpoints, and proves that the debate on the problem of the transformation is false, which originates from the misunderstanding of the transformation theory of Marx.
元の言語Chinese (Simplified)
ページ(範囲)159-175
ページ数17
ジャーナルJournal of Economics of Shanghai School
14
発行部数1
出版物ステータスPublished - 2016
外部発表Yes

Fingerprint

Authenticity
Karl Marx
Transformation Theory
Misunderstanding

これを引用

@article{8633d0d75ea64c95a62dcee283537a14,
title = "转形论争问题真实性考察: 兼与胡代光、马艳、白暴力、丁堡骏、余斌等商榷",
abstract = "转形问题历来是马克思主义经济学家热烈争论的问题,但一直未能达成共识。本文提出了转形论争问题的由来和依据,归纳了若干代表性学者的观点,并且证明关于转形问题的论争是虚假的,它源于转形论争者对马克思转形理论的误解。",
keywords = "Transition Theory, Transition Controversy, The Problem of Transition Controversy, Authenticity, 转形理论, 转形论争, 转形论争问题, 真实性考察",
author = "永寿 曾",
year = "2016",
language = "Chinese (Simplified)",
volume = "14",
pages = "159--175",
journal = "Journal of Economics of Shanghai School",
publisher = "上海财经大学海派经济学研究中心",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - 转形论争问题真实性考察

T2 - 兼与胡代光、马艳、白暴力、丁堡骏、余斌等商榷

AU - 曾, 永寿

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - 转形问题历来是马克思主义经济学家热烈争论的问题,但一直未能达成共识。本文提出了转形论争问题的由来和依据,归纳了若干代表性学者的观点,并且证明关于转形问题的论争是虚假的,它源于转形论争者对马克思转形理论的误解。

AB - 转形问题历来是马克思主义经济学家热烈争论的问题,但一直未能达成共识。本文提出了转形论争问题的由来和依据,归纳了若干代表性学者的观点,并且证明关于转形问题的论争是虚假的,它源于转形论争者对马克思转形理论的误解。

KW - Transition Theory

KW - Transition Controversy

KW - The Problem of Transition Controversy

KW - Authenticity

KW - 转形理论

KW - 转形论争

KW - 转形论争问题

KW - 真实性考察

M3 - 文章

VL - 14

SP - 159

EP - 175

JO - Journal of Economics of Shanghai School

JF - Journal of Economics of Shanghai School

IS - 1

ER -