回到斯密,还是要回到马克思?

研究成果: Article

抜粋

Both Yifu Lin and Weiying Zhang advocate returning to Smith. Weiying Zhang insist the opinions of Adam Smith' s liberalization,marketization, privatization, but put side historical limitations of Smith' s ideas .This is what we are firmly against. Yifu Lin favorite is the method of Smith's An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations,but he don't understand that the method is duality, conflict, non-historical,and that the method is not suitable for the actual situation of contemporary China. Now, we must be going back to Marx’s standpoint, viewpoint and method, which is the only guiding ideology. Marx' s standpoint, viewpoint and method can guide the construction of the socialist market economy in contemporary China, and explain local phenomena in the development of market economy.
寄稿の翻訳されたタイトルReturn to Adam Smith,or to Return to Marx?
元の言語Chinese (Simplified)
ページ(範囲)11-21
ページ数11
ジャーナル海派经济学
15
発行部数2
出版物ステータスPublished - 2017

フィンガープリント 回到斯密,还是要回到马克思?' の研究トピックを掘り下げます。これらはともに一意のフィンガープリントを構成します。

  • これを引用